CTC SMART TECHFrom work evidence
to a development plan.
A design case study from the AI HR capability: employees update evidence, managers review, HR coordinates calibration and employees respond to results.
CTC SMART TECHEvery step has an input.
Every decision has a basis.
Goals
Publish criteria, weights and permissions before the cycle.
Evidence
Employees update work and self-review.
Review
Managers check against the rubric and write evidence-based comments.
CTC SMART TECHFrom existing sources
to proposed design.
An AI HR landing and Performance Analytics direction exist; the review system, assistant and apps in this kit are proposed prototypes using no real HR data.
Source
CTC Smart Tech AI HR & Performance Analytics direction
Scope
No automatic scoring, no pay/discipline decisions, no inference of emotion or personality.
CTC SMART TECHPeople Development workspace
CTC SMART TECHPeople Development assistant
CTC SMART TECHWork handed over
through one record.
01
Awaiting self-review
02
Awaiting manager review
03
Awaiting HR calibration
04
Sample result published
CTC SMART TECHEmployee
CTC SMART TECHFocus on the work
that needs handling.
01
View the goals and criteria for the cycle.
02
Submit evidence and the self-review.
03
Respond to results once published.
CTC SMART TECHLine manager
CTC SMART TECHFocus on the work
that needs handling.
01
Read employee evidence within the managed scope.
02
Check against the rubric, write comments and development suggestions.
03
Send the file to calibration.
CTC SMART TECHHR / Calibration committee
CTC SMART TECHFocus on the work
that needs handling.
01
Check process completeness and the basis for comments.
02
Coordinate calibration and record reasons for any change.
03
Publish within scope and receive responses.
CTC SMART TECHRole-based apps.
Shared business data.
Experience
Admin workspace, mobile apps and assistant access the same record code.
Platform
Permissioned APIs, business services and change logs.
Data
Versioned sources, source-system integration and sync.
CTC SMART TECHCompare sources
before concluding.
EVIDENCE-DEMO v1
Simulated work-completion documents with no real employee names or results.
RUBRIC-DEMO v1
Reviews based on goals, output quality and collaboration; the manager is accountable for comments.
POLICY-DEMO-HR
Employees may respond. No biometrics, inferred emotion or AI decides the final score.
CTC SMART TECHApproval tied to
the accountable person.
Employee
Own file only; cannot view colleagues’ reviews.
Line manager
Assigned employees only; cannot publish results that skipped required steps.
HR / Calibration committee
Per review-cycle policy; admin rights are not used to disclose data beyond scope.
CTC SMART TECHTry in a small scope.
Measure before scaling.
01
Choose one position group; agree the rubric and access policy.
02
Build a cleared evidence set and the review forms.
03
Run a trial cycle with three roles, calibration and responses.
04
Accept access rights, review basis and development actions.
CTC SMART TECHProve it with
scenarios and data.
01
Submission only when the self-review has evidence and a complete checklist.
02
Reviews are evidence-based before HR publishes.
03
Employees can respond within their own file.
04
No automated decisions on scores, pay or discipline.
CTC SMART TECHDefine the priority
problem together.
info@smarttechctc.io · (+84) 032 9119 825
Case study
solutions.smarttechctc.io/case-study/performance-review-cycle/
Pilot
Fix scope, data sources, owners and acceptance criteria.